Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02520
Original file (BC 2012 02520.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02520 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Tampa, FL 33602. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His HOR was listed as his father’s residence. It is incorrectly 
listed on his enlistment and reenlistment papers. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

According to the applicant’s DD Form 4, ENLISTMENT/REENLISTMENT 
DOCUMENT, his HOR is Southaven, MS. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. DPSIPE states the applicant’s 
records reflect Southaven, MS as his HOR. In addition, 
Southaven, MS is consistently listed throughout his records as 
his HOR. It is also reflected on his DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United 
States and DD Form 1996, Record of Military Processing – Armed 
Forces of the United States. 

 

DPSIPE notes the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR) for 
Uniformed Service Members Appendix A states that the HOR is 
placed as the home of the individual when commissioned, 
appointed, enlisted, inducted or ordered into a tour of active 
duty. Any correction made to a member’s HOR must be fully 
justified and the home, as corrected, must be the member’s actual 
home upon entering the service and not a different place selected 
for the member’s convenience. 

 

The complete DPSIPE evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 26 Jul 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 11 Mar 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 


The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-02520: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 May 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 27 Jun 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Jul 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02240

    Original file (BC-2012-02240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02480 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Arizona (AZ) to XXXXXXX, Massachusetts (MA). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03114

    Original file (BC 2012 03114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04328

    Original file (BC-2012-04328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Elizabethtown, PA as his home of record at the time of his enlistment. EXAMINERS NOTE: The applicant states his HOR reflects Elizabethtown, CA; however, it was confirmed that his records reflect Elizabethtown, PA. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03524

    Original file (BC 2011 03524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's initial DD Form 4 reflects Mentor, Minnesota as the city/state in which he lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout his military records as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03867

    Original file (BC 2012 03867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records reflect Atwater, California as the HOR at which he resided prior to entering the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02679

    Original file (BC-2012-02679.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02679 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Dayton, Ohio to Fremont, California. Her complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01990

    Original file (BC-2012-01990.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01990 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect an address in Hawaii. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01906

    Original file (BC-2012-01906.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS HEARING DESIRED: NO DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01906 COUNSEL: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to 2330 Buckboard Trail, Cottonwood, AZ 86326. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04055

    Original file (BC 2013 04055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04055 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from “Jena, Louisiana” to “New Hope, Alabama.” ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He lived in Alabama at the time he enlisted. He reenlisted in the Regular Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04018

    Original file (BC-2012-04018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04018 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Dunkirk, Maryland (MD) to Eagle River, Alaska (AK). The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe that his home of record was erroneously...